Get the CIFOR publications update

CIFOR publishes over 400 publications every year on forests and climate change, landscape restoration, rights, forest policy, agroforestry and much more in multiple languages.

Prioritizing criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management: a case study on participatory decision making

Prioritizing criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management: a case study on participatory decision making

This paper describes an application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in assessing criteria and indicators (C&I) as measures of sustainable forest management. C&I elements are organised in hierarchical manner around the three general concepts, namely: Principle, Criteria and Indicators. These elements are prioritised based on their perceived relative importance values. These values are calculated using pairwise comparisons of the C&I elements following the principles of the AHP. Pairwise comparisons were obtained from experts representing various disciplines related to forest management. C&I analysis is done at different levels in the hierarchy. To demonstrate the method, a C&I assessment case study involves a forest located in Kalimantan, Indonesia. A generic set of C&I is used as a benchmark. AHP is used to calculate the relative weights of each C&I, prioritize them, and ultimately select a final set of C&I to be used in assessing the sustainability of the forest.

Authors: Mendoza, G.A.; Prabhu, R.

Topic: sustainability,forest management,criteria,indicators,analysis,case studies

Geographic: Indonesia,Kalimantan

Series: Embrapa Amazonia Oriental Documentos no. 72

Pages: 57p.

Publisher: Embrapa Amazonia Oriental and CIFOR, Belem, Brazil

Publication Year: 2001

ISBN: 0-7923-7076-7

Source: Schmoldt, D.L., Kangas, J, Mendoza, G.A. and Pesonen, M. (eds.) The analytic hierarchy process in natural resource and environmental decision making. 115-130


Related viewing

Top