Get the CIFOR publications update

CIFOR publishes over 400 publications every year on forests and climate change, landscape restoration, rights, forest policy, agroforestry and much more in multiple languages.

The role of multi-stakeholder forums in subnational jurisdictions: Framing literature review for in-depth field research

The role of multi-stakeholder forums in subnational jurisdictions: Framing literature review for in-depth field research

This Framing Literature Review for In-depth Field Research draws on the knowledge produced from 30+ years of experience in participatory processes. It informs the Center for International Forestry Research’s (CIFOR) research of multi-stakeholder forums (MSFs) set up to address land use and land-use change at the subnational level in Brazil, Ethiopia, Indonesia and Peru. This literature review should be read in tandem with the project’s Methods Training Manual for In-depth Field Research.

MSFs are set up as purposely organized interactive processes that bring together a range of stakeholders to participate in dialogue, decision making and/or implementation regarding actions to address a common problem or to achieve a goal for their common benefit. The growth of MSFs related to land use/land-use change reflects the awareness that environmental problems cannot be addressed without the effective engagement of the actors that determine land-use practices on the ground; nor can such problems be resolved within a conservation community when the drivers are located in other sectors. MSFs may produce more effective and sustainable outcomes by getting actors with contradictory development priorities to coordinate and align goals through discussion, negotiation and planning. In contrast, MSFs may also help to implement top-down approaches and create the illusion of participation. Scholars and activists note that ‘MSF’ may reify these approaches, and take the ‘participation’ of local stakeholders for granted in box-ticking exercises to please donors.

This research is timely, because MSFs have received renewed attention from policy makers and development and conservation practitioners in light of the growing urgency to address climate change and transform development trajectories. The comparative project aims to contribute empirically to the study of MSFs and similar participatory processes.

Authors: Sarmiento Barletti, J.P.; Larson, A.M.

Topic: land use, climate change, conservation, community forestry, development

Geographic: Brazil,Ethiopia,Indonesia,Peru

Series: CIFOR Occasional Paper no. 194

Pages: 23p

Publisher: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia

Publication Year: 2019

ISBN: 978-602-387-120-9

DOI: 10.17528/cifor/007150


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Altmetric score:

Download Option:

Export Citation

Related viewing

Top

CIFOR website usability survey

We're conducting research on our website and we'd love to hear from you about your experience on cifor.org. This will help us make improvements and prioritize new features. The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your responses are completely anonymous.

If you have any questions about the survey, please email us: cifor@cgiar.org

We really appreciate your input!

Start survey
I don’t want to participate
Remind me later