Get the CIFOR publications update

CIFOR publishes over 400 publications every year on forests and climate change, landscape restoration, rights, forest policy, agroforestry and much more in multiple languages.

Investments in different taxonomies of goods: What should Nepal’s community forest user groups prioritize?

Investments in different taxonomies of goods: What should Nepal’s community forest user groups prioritize?

Community forestry was initiated four decades ago in Nepal, with the aim of conserving forests and providing basic forest products to proximate households for subsistence use. Many resources were invested in improving the well-being of local communities, especially through the selling of forest products. However, there is limited knowledge of how this investment contributes to well-being. Following the concept of economic goods, this paper elucidates how community forest investment in different taxonomies of goods contributes to households’ well-being. A statistically representative (n = 377) household survey was carried out in the Terai and mid-hills, representing different income groups (low, middle and affluent), along with focus group discussions and key informant interviews in two community forests. The data collection was supplemented with an analysis of community forest-user groups’ records and their interactions with stakeholders. Two-stage statistical models were developed to explain the effect of the investment in different taxonomies of goods to household well-being, where economic factors were confounded in the first stage, followed by multinomial regression. Investment in private goods, especially in income and employment-generating activities, positively contributes to household well-being. In contrast, investment in public and common goods may not necessarily contribute to well-being, emphasizing the need to identify goods that positively contribute to the household well-being. We argue that appropriate policy reforms should be made to prioritize investment in private goods by the community forest user groups that maximize the contribution of community forestry to human well-being, especially that of low-income households.

Authors: Baral, S.; Khanal Chhetri, B.B.; Baral, H.; Vacik, H.

Topic: household surveys, community forestry, investment, forest products

Geographic: Nepal

Publication Year: 2019

ISSN: 1389-9341

Source: Forest Policy and Economics 100: 24-32

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.11.006

Altmetric score:


Export Citation

Related viewing

Top

CIFOR website usability survey

We're conducting research on our website and we'd love to hear from you about your experience on cifor.org. This will help us make improvements and prioritize new features. The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your responses are completely anonymous.

If you have any questions about the survey, please email us: cifor@cgiar.org

We really appreciate your input!

Start survey
I don’t want to participate
Remind me later