Get the CIFOR publications update

CIFOR publishes over 400 publications every year on forests and climate change, landscape restoration, rights, forest policy, agroforestry and much more in multiple languages.

Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES): Assessment of PES Potential in Kapuas Hulu

Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES): Assessment of PES Potential in Kapuas Hulu

The CoLUPSIA project conducted an assessment of the potential of establishing payment for ecosystem services (PES) for two regencies in Indonesia. The objectives of the present study were to determine the feasibility of PES projects in the Kapuas Hulu regency, West Kalimantan, to assess whether there is potential for PES at our study sites and, if so, identify the opportunities, constraints, risks, risk mitigation and needed steps for future actions. The method used followed the CoLUPSIA’s PES methodological guidelines (Fripp 2014).
Interviews were conducted with the national park office, regency forestry office, oil palm plantation company, water company, NGOs and local communities, exploring the wider potential for PES projects in Kapuas Hulu. The assessment focused predominantly on the socioeconomic, institutional and governance aspects, and so the findings can be applied to any PES project, beyond carbon sequestration alone.
The results show that potential for PES in Kapuas Hulu range from carbon projects to PES bundles in the five locations that were assessed. The hamlet of Keluin and village of Nanga Dua are examples of potential for PES bundles that improve biodiversity through land rehabilitation and could be bundled with carbon stock and micro hydro projects. In Tinting Seligi, where an oil palm plantation has been operated, a carbon project from rubber production could be one of the PES options. In addition, in the hamlets of Nanga Hovat and Benua Tengah, there is the potential for carbon storage and sequestration projects the beauty of the landscape could provide a basis ecotourism.
It is important to understand that this work focused on the opportunities for PES, but did not assess the feasibility of any identified specific PES projects. If a PES project is to be developed following our recommendations, then a full feasibility assessment should be conducted during the design phase.

Authors: Fripp, E.; Shantiko, B.

Topic: payments for ecosystem services,villages,governance,benefit sharing

Geographic: Indonesia,Kalimantan

Series: CIFOR Working Paper no. 165

Publisher: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia

Publication Year: 2014

DOI: 10.17528/cifor/005406

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Altmetric score:

Download Option:

Export Citation

Related viewing


CIFOR website usability survey

We're conducting research on our website and we'd love to hear from you about your experience on This will help us make improvements and prioritize new features. The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your responses are completely anonymous.

If you have any questions about the survey, please email us:

We really appreciate your input!

Start survey
I don’t want to participate
Remind me later