Collaborative forest management (CFM) is loosely defined as a working partnership
between the key stakeholders in the management of a given forestkey stakeholders
being local forest users and state forest departments, as well as parties such as local
governments, civic groups and nongovernmental organisations, and the private sector.
The paper reviews worldwide experience in CFM to date, considering the forms that it
takes in different tenure situations. Overall, mechanisms of CFM are diversifying,
reflecting a greater recognition of the need for partnerships in forest management. Due
to entrenched power structures within both government institutions and communities, it
is not easy to promote social justice and sustainable livelihoods through CFM.
Nevertheless, examples exist of local people gaining a strong, legally backed voice in
forest management. Whether or not CFM is financially viable depends very much on
local circumstancesan important issue is the inclusion of all costs and values. CFM
can clearly lead to better forest management, although examples of silvicultural
innovations specifically designed to meet CFM needs are limited. Worldwide, the
institutionalisation of CFM is proceeding at a different pace and to differing degrees.
Whilst some of the most rapid recent CFM developments have taken place in the
North, where government forest institutions are well funded and accountable, and civil
society well organised, the most significant gains made to date probably lie in
countries of the South and East, wherever local people have begun to enjoy real
partnerships in forest management, based on recognised rights of use and access.
Topic: forest management,collaboration,partnerships,reviews,institutions,government,communities
Series: CIFOR Occasional Paper no. 43
Pages: v, 48p.
Publisher: CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia
Publication Year: 2005Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.