Get the CIFOR publications update

CIFOR publishes over 400 publications every year on forests and climate change, landscape restoration, rights, forest policy, agroforestry and much more in multiple languages.

First experiences with adaptive co-management in Para, Brazilian Amazon

First experiences with adaptive co-management in Para, Brazilian Amazon

Adaptive Co-Management (ACM) is an integrative approach for implementing
sustainable forest management, based on a main hypothesis, that is: if there is a high
degree of collaboration between stakeholders combined with a high adaptiveness of
management systems, the result will be a higher degree of human well-being and
ecological sustainability. A worldwide network under the umbrella of the Center for
International Forestry Research (CIFOR) is engaged in researching the potential and
methodological aspects related to ACM. Financed by CIFOR and the German
Development Cooperation (GTZ), an ACM team started to work on ACM in Para, in
2000. ACM pilot activities in Pará were carried out in three sites, each reflecting
different realities of communities established in the Eastern Amazon region. Research
was focused on the concept of Collaborative Diagnostic Studies (CDS) as an
opportunity to replace externally driven background studies which are important for
documentation and impact monitoring, for a collaborative evaluation of an expert
defined set of criteria and indicators for assessing sustainability (C&I). The research
considered the definition of a set of C&I suitable for discussion with local actors, the
test of strategies to accomplish CDS and the elaboration of a reporting system to
document the ACM process. According to the central hypothesis of ACM, the defined
set of C&I was structured in three categories: collaboration, adaptive management of
natural resources and impacts/conditions. A variety of participatory methods were
tested, described and evaluated in relation to their contribution to ACM. Finally an
ACM database system was defined, based on reports for (1) evaluation of C&I, (2)
documentation of activities, (3) description of methods and (4) evaluation of the ACM
process. Pilot studies showed that CDS are not suitable as a substitute for
background studies. Special efforts have to be undertaken so as to diminish the danger of external dominance and to ensure the participation of local actors. The pilot studies also confirmed the need for a systematic and well structured documentation of the complex and dynamic processes related to ACM. Pilot studies also showed the high potential of ACM for implementing sustainable forest management. Due to the promising results, it is recommended to focus ACM research in Brazil on work shared with Local Researcher Teams. In order to establish ACM as a viable development strategy in the Amazon region, an intensive collaboration with existing community projects is desired.

Authors: Pokorny, B.; Cayres, G.; Nunes, W.; Segebart, D.; Drude, R.

Topic: collaboration,community forestry,criteria,indicators

Geographic: Brazil,Amazonia

Publisher: Embrapa Amazonia Oriental, Belem, Brazil

Publication Year: 2003

Source: Sabogal, C. and Silva, N. (eds.) Integrated management of neotropical rain forests by industries and communities. 258-280

Export Citation

Related viewing


CIFOR website usability survey

We're conducting research on our website and we'd love to hear from you about your experience on This will help us make improvements and prioritize new features. The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your responses are completely anonymous.

If you have any questions about the survey, please email us:

We really appreciate your input!

Start survey
I don’t want to participate
Remind me later