Prioritizing criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management: a case study on participatory decision making

Export citation

This paper describes an application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in assessing criteria and indicators (C&I) as measures of sustainable forest management. C&I elements are organised in hierarchical manner around the three general concepts, namely: Principle, Criteria and Indicators. These elements are prioritised based on their perceived relative importance values. These values are calculated using pairwise comparisons of the C&I elements following the principles of the AHP. Pairwise comparisons were obtained from experts representing various disciplines related to forest management. C&I analysis is done at different levels in the hierarchy. To demonstrate the method, a C&I assessment case study involves a forest located in Kalimantan, Indonesia. A generic set of C&I is used as a benchmark. AHP is used to calculate the relative weights of each C&I, prioritize them, and ultimately select a final set of C&I to be used in assessing the sustainability of the forest.

    Schmoldt, D.L., Kangas, J, Mendoza, G.A. and Pesonen, M. (eds.). 2001. The analytic hierarchy process in natural resource and environmental decision making. 115-130

    Publication year





    Mendoza, G.A.; Prabhu, R.




Related publications

Get the CIFOR-ICRAF latest news