Financing REDD+ is complex, due to the need to seek answers not only to the question of who should finance REDD+, but also who should benefit from it. This paper examines the perceptions of REDD+ stakeholders in Brazil, Indonesia and Vietnam on different aspects of financing: who should finance REDD+ and who should receive REDD+ benefits for what. Our findings show these issues are political, driven by economic considerations at national level and – despite the narrative of inclusive, participatory decision making – are largely determined by governments. Lack of finance was thereby not always considered by national policy actors to be the most significant challenge during 2010–2019; rather other issues – like lack of knowledge on REDD+ by relevant actors; ineffective coordination between state agencies, the private sector and civil society; unclear tenure rights; ineffectively addressing the main deforestation drivers; low law enforcement capacity; and unclear benefit-sharing mechanisms – have also been perceived to impede REDD+ implementation and payment distributions.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102330Altmetric score:
Dimensions Citation Count:
- Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, and Nuclear Safety – Germany (BMU)
- Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NORAD)
Source
Global Environmental Change 70: 102330
Publication year
2021
ISSN
0959-3780
Authors
Pham, T.T.; Moeliono, M.; Yuwono, J.; Dwisatrio, B.; Gallo, P.
Geographic
Indonesia, Viet Nam, Brazil
Topic
Research was conducted by project
Funded by
Geographic
Indonesia, Viet Nam, Brazil
Project Leader
Christopher Martius
Bonn Hub Leader and Managing Director of CIFOR Germany