In addition to being a global strategy for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from tropical deforestation, Reducing Emission from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD+) intends to protect and improve the well-being and income of local stakeholders. The intention is to provide livelihood support in exchange for local stakeholder involvement in protecting forests. Eleven years after the launch of REDD+ at COP 11 in Montreal, the degree of success in meeting well-being and income goals is examined in six countries (Brazil, Peru, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, Vietnam) at 22 initiatives, 149 villages, and approximately 4000 households through a counter-factual approach. Half the villages and households are inside and half are outside the sphere of REDD+. Measurements are made at two points in time (2010-2012, and 2013-2014). This paper focuses on measurement of the subjective perception of local stakeholders. The study finds that REDD+ has not contributed significantly to perceived well-being and income sufficiency, in spite of the fact that most households have not only engaged with REDD+ interventions, but view them favorably. REDD+'s limited achievement to date is due to unavailability of funding, among other obstacles. Recommendations are made for enhanced attention to well-being and income sufficiency in the event that REDD+ eventually takes off.
Download:
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3390/f8040125Altmetric score:
Dimensions Citation Count:
Source
Forests 8(4): 125
Publication year
2017
ISSN
1999-4907
Authors
Sunderlin, W.D.; de Sassi, C.; Ekaputri, A.D.; Light, M.; Pratama, C.D.
Geographic
Brazil, Peru, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, Viet Nam
Topic
Research was conducted by project
Funded by
Geographic
Brazil, Peru, Cameroon, Tanzania, Indonesia, Viet Nam
Project Leader
Christopher Martius
Bonn Hub Leader and Managing Director of CIFOR Germany