Can Evidence and Voice Influence Policy? A Critical Assessment of Nepal’s Forestry Sector Strategy, 2014

Can Evidence and Voice Influence Policy? A Critical Assessment of Nepal’s Forestry Sector Strategy, 2014

This article examines Nepal’s recently prepared Forestry Sector Strategy (FSS) (as of 2014) in terms of the use of scientific evidence and the quality of stakeholder participation. By reviewing the content and analyzing the context of its development during 2012–2014, we found that the transitional politics and overt influence of international development agencies dominated the process and content of the FSS. Although the FSS was developed through a significant stakeholder engagement, there was limited use of the available scientific evidence. The FSS was narrowly conceived as a deliverable of supporting aid programs, with limited demand for a politically meaningful policy processes. While civil society groups were consulted, they largely failed to present an independent voice due to their dependence on funding agencies. Our assessment calls for rethinking policy development in a way that facilitates assertive and independent participation by a range of actors and make better use of the available research.

Authors: Ojha, H.R.; Khatri, D.B.; Shrestha, K.; Bhattarai, B.; Baral, J.C.; Sijapati Basnett, B.; Goutam, K.R.; Sunam, R.K.; Banjade, M.R.; Jana, S.; Bushley, B.R.; Dhungana, S.P.; Paudel, D.

Topic: community forestry,development,policy

Geographic: Nepal

Publication Year: 2016

ISSN: 0894-1920

Source: Society and Natural Resources 29(3): 357-373

DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2015.1122851

Altmetric score:


Export Citation

Related viewing

Top